Walpole Community Television, which has been under fire during the past year and a half over various allegations of impropriety with their funding and lack of accountability, will host an open house at their studio on East Street on Thursday, July 31 from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m., according to a flyer posted on their website.
WCTV will apparently give away prizes at the televised open house, including a flat-screen TV, and free t-shirts.
“Original giclee prints,” made by WCTV President Bill St. George, will also be given away.
The town of Walpole cut off WCTV’s revenue stream last year, and the station is currently operating solely with more than $1 million in funds that have been saved up over many years of operation. Until Selectmen cut the organization’s funding, WCTV was funded through PEG fees – essentially a tax – on cable subscribers. WCTV removed their Director, Bob Hood, earlier this year, to save money. However WCTV’s most recent tax return, from 2013, shows that the Board has continued to spend money on questionable or frivolous items, including more than $15,000 in advertising expenses to a firm owned by the Board’s president, more than $11,000 in compensation to Board members, more than $2,000 in production expenses to two Board members, and more than $50,000 alone on what is categorized as “advertising and promotion.” St. George’s wife also is the organization’s paid administrative assistant – a position that had not existed before about two years ago.
WCTV spent more than $30,000 of cable subscribers’ money on legal expenses, primarily to fight Selectmen in their efforts to enact accountability and oversight for cable subscribers. As a result of the Board’s resistance, Selectmen recently formed a task force to explore new options for cable television in the community. This task force’s ultimate proposal could result in a totally new cable station being built while WCTV eventually spends its money down and dissolves.
In a letter to the editor in The Walpole Times in early June, St. George said that “the subscribers’ money is safe and being used wisely,” and that because “the funding has been taken by town government,” WCTV is “now at a standstill.”
WCTV’s troubles came to a head at an explosive special membership meeting that was held in February, during which the defiant Board, which at the time had only four members, responded to questions from a number of irate cable subscribers on live television. The meeting, which was even attended by a uniformed police officer to keep the peace, had been held because of a petition circulated by cable subscribers to force the Board to answer questions about the controversies swirling around the station.
At that meeting, cable subscribers attempted to orchestrate the removal of several members of the Board, which is permitted under the state laws governing non-profits, but were rebuffed by the Board’s attorney (who was ironically being paid by the cable subscribers themselves.)
Selectman Mark Gallivan and Finance Committee member Susan Lawson attended the meeting, along with several influential members of Town Meeting. The Board refused calls to hold a special election so that cable subscribers could elect a new Board. After that meeting, the Board appointed a fifth member, Richard Morton, on their own, without an election or public input process of any kind. The Board has maintained that they intend to hold a public Board election in September, which had been postponed by the Board from its usual date in mid-January. They also expressed interest in restarting negotiations with the town to restore their funding, but would not agree to certain provisions that Selectmen requested.
Former Walpole Selectman Eric Kraus has left the job that had forced him to leave the Board after one term last year, setting up speculation that he intends to launch another campaign for Selectman next year.
Kraus, who took a job with Bacardi, based in Bermuda, in 2013, left that job shortly before this year’s Spring Town Meeting. He has reportedly begun informing people that he may run again for the town’s top board next year. That doesn’t surprise many political observers – when he left last year, he vowed to return to politics again.
Selectmen recently appointed Kraus to be a member of the Cable TV Task Force that is developing a new plan for cable access in the community.
Walpole Finance Committee Chairman Larry Pitman, also a RTM from Precinct 1, stepped down from the Finance Committee upon the expiration of his term on July 1. He was replaced on the Fin. Com. by former Precinct 4 RTM Mark Trudell, who just lost his seat in Town Meeting in this year’s election. Trudell was known as one of Town Meeting’s hardest-working members, routinely questioning articles on the warrant, doing extensive research on the issues, and questioning certain items in an intelligent, articulate manner. Trudell works for a construction company as their Controller. He is a CPA, and has kids either currently or previously in the school system.
Rockwood said “no other changes” are expected at this time in the makeup of the three committees that he appoints. Five members of the Fin. Com., including Pitman, were up for re-appointment this year, along with two members of the Capital Budget Committee, and one member of the Personnel Board.
As Moderator, he appoints members of all three of those committees.
Rockwood won re-election in June against attorney Tom Brady by a margin of fewer than 100 votes.
Speaking of Finance Committee chairmen, Tom Jalkut has left Walpole permanently.
Jalkut, who was Finance Committee chairman when he was famously removed from that committee, along with four other members, by Town Moderator Jon Rockwood in 2010, was once considered a rising star in local politics. He was seen as a potential opponent to Rockwood in the wake of that 2010 incident, but he never made any sort of town-wide run and let his term as an RTM expire without running again.
Jalkut and his wife sold their home on Baker Street earlier this month, and now own a condo in Boston, where Jalkut works as an attorney.
Jalkut is the latest in a troubling exodus of hard-working taxpayers who have departed Walpole for other locales in recent months, looking for better communities.
When Tom Menino ended his 20-year tenure as Mayor of Boston earlier this year, he earned accolades from many in the city, and the region, for his role as an “urban mechanic” who had focused on hyper-local neighborhood issues while helping to transform the city’s economy.
But there were also some in the city who breathed a sigh of relief that he was gone. Menino was a notoriously thin-skinned micro-manager, who had done a lot of good for the city of Boston, but had also made his share of enemies.
He held many long-term grudges and could be ruthless in his vindictiveness. Certain businesses, developers, and neighborhood activists found it difficult to get support they needed from City Hall if he didn’t like them.
At the same time, Menino was well-liked by those who he needed to please the most – his constituents. He was charismatic, responsive to residents, and had an often self-deprecating sense of humor. Voters re-elected him five times, by overwhelming margins.
Menino had maintained such an outsize role in city affairs for so long, that when he stepped down, it put much of the city in a state of uncertainty.
“In a city where everyone in the business community knew where they stood, suddenly no one is quite sure what happens next,” one Boston Globe reporter wrote shortly after Menino announced last March that he would step down.
A similar dilemma, albeit on a smaller scale, now faces the Walpole Board of Selectmen, as a certain Walpole politician, who shared many of Menino’s traits and management style, enters his final days in office.
Town Administrator Michael Boynton, who has been in office since 2001, announced last month that he will leave Walpole to hold the same position in Medway. His last day in Walpole will be July 17.
Like Menino, Boynton made plenty of adversaries– though his, unlike Menino’s, tended to be other politicians rather than businesses. But when it came time to get things done – to manage the operations of the town in a competent manner – Boynton was a stable leader who had a good handle on the duties of the position. He responded to and followed up on constituent concerns, had vast knowledge of government operations and finances, and was generally accessible to residents who wanted to talk to him, as long as he liked them.
Despite all of Boynton’s personal flaws, and the occasional controversies that he brought to the office during his administration, he maintained a level of stability while other communities saw repeated turnovers in their own Town Administrators.
In communities in Massachusetts, it is unusual for a Town Administrator to last in the job more than about ten years, according to one estimate from the Mass. Municipal Management Association.
Boynton not only surpassed the ten-year mark, but he could have stayed in Walpole a lot longer if he wanted to. Selectmen are in no hurry to see him go.
While Boynton maintained significant support from Selectmen and other town officials, he was criticized frequently for his paranoid, controlling nature, and tendency to mistrust and hold grudges against town employees, committee members, and even residents. During the last two years of his administration, Boynton faced several scandals and cases of mismanagement under his watch, and was famously denounced by two disgruntled ZBA members who felt he was micromanaging their board.
Like Menino had done to the Mayor’s office, Boynton used his office as a weapon, both for good and bad. He was perhaps the most powerful Town Administrator this town has ever seen.
Selectmen now have the task of redefining what the job description actually entails – not what Boynton turned it into.
Boynton’s huge power was enabled in large part by Selectmen that grew accustomed over 13 years to allowing him to tell them what to do, not the other way around. Boynton was an overly active participant in Selectmen meetings and Town Meetings – in steep contrast to Town Administrators in other towns. Boynton was fanatical about keeping Selectmen informed about town issues, but that meant he also controlled the flow of information. He had a way with words such that he could turn a seemingly major crisis at Town Hall into a minor dust-up that could be talked away. Boynton often even helped Selectmen construct the phrasing of motions during their meetings, and routinely butted in during discussions to offer his own opinions or debate individuals who came before the Board.
The Town Administrator should not have as commanding a role at Town Meeting and Selectmen meetings as Boynton did. The Town Administrator should only speak when called upon for information, not intervene during the proceedings to engage in debate.
In choosing a new Town Administrator, Selectmen must recognize that they – not the Town Administrator – are the ultimate decision-makers in Walpole. The Town Administrator simply serves as their eyes and ears during the day, because many Selectmen have full-time jobs and other commitments of their own. Selectmen set policy, while the Town Administrator executes those policies.
Selectmen should expect Boynton’s successor to implement their wishes – not instruct them as to what their wishes should be.
Responsiveness, charisma, knowledge, and accessibility are all traits that Walpole needs in a Town Administrator, but only to a point. Where Boynton went too far was in not only being responsive, but lecturing those who disagreed with him.
A Town Administrator also should not micromanage town employees; he should respect town employees and work collaboratively with them. The Town Administrator should not be afraid to entrust major decisions to Department Heads.
Boynton was a professional bureaucrat, who, after decades of service in various municipalities, had developed a way of justifying just about any expense in the budget, be it big or small. Boynton was notorious for convincing Selectmen and the Finance Committee, along with Town Meeting, that certain expenditures in the budget were necessary. Even so-called fiscal conservatives on the Board of Selectmen ended up falling under his spell, routinely supporting unnecessary spending when they should have known better.
The Town Administrator should be a solid fiscal conservative, who can bring about savings in any budget but who does so with fairness and compassion, rather than out of vindictiveness to avenge town employees or departments who have wronged him.
One area where Selectmen particularly need to take a central role, and where the new Town Administrator will need to take a back seat, is in union negotiations and town health insurance. Boynton took over too much involvement in those areas, which was likely detrimental to town taxpayers. The Town Administrator should not participate in union negotiations without at least a town board member and legal counsel at the table representing the town.
Boynton also received criticism for his decision to reside in Bellingham, rather than Walpole, which had been a break from past practice of Town Administrators. During the early years of his administration, the town charter was modified to permit the Town Administrator to live outside of town limits, as long as it was within a 15-mile distance. While Walpole would be best served by a Town Administrator who also pays taxes in town, it is understandable that the best candidate for the position may not also be capable of living in town for any number of reasons. Nevertheless, Selectmen should actively encourage Town Administrators to live in town. Selectmen never discouraged Boynton from leaving town, which was a mistake.
With Michael Boynton’s 13-year tenure in Walpole coming to an end, read the October 25, 2001 Walpole Times article about Boynton’s hiring.
Below is the full text of Town Administrator Michael Boynton’s resignation letter to the Walpole Board of Selectmen, sent on June 17, 2014:
As you are aware, I have been offered and have accepted the position of Town Administrator for the Town of Medway. As such, please accept my formal resignation from my position as Town Administrator here in Walpole. Per the terms of my agreement with the Town, I will provide the Board with 30-days thereby ending my employment on July 17, 2014.
The decision to leave Walpole was not an easy one to make. I am very proud of the successes and accomplishments we as a Community have seen in the past twelve-plus years, and am privileged to have served with a tremendous group of department heads and staff. You can be assured that the team in place here is as good as there is and dedicated to the mission of preserving Walpole as an outstanding place to live and work. In a special way, I want to recognize and thank Jim Johnson and Cindy Berube for all of their amazing efforts and support day in and day out. Walpole is fortunate to have both of these professionals, and together they will help guide the organization during the search for my successor. I too want to thank you and all the Boards of Selectmen I have served since 2001. We have tackled many major issues and topics along the way, and collectively have worked in the best interest of the Town at all times with positive results. And, most importantly, I want to thank the residents of Walpole for the confidence placed in me as their Town Administrator. It has been an honor and a pleasure, and I will cherish the memories and friendships I have made along the way. I am indeed excited and encouraged about beginning in Medway, but I will always hold Walpole and her people in a special place in my heart.
I thank you again for all of your guidance, leadership and support, and I wish each of you the very best.
Peter Betro won another seat on the Housing Authority in the June 7 town election, on a write-in campaign that garnered him 153 votes.
His closest runner-up, for write-in votes, was former Town Moderator Stephen Sullivan, who received 76 votes. Sullivan launched a small write-in campaign. Sullivan has not served in a town-wide elected post since losing the Moderator’s seat in 1996 to Jim Brady.
Betro also operates Betro’s Pharmacy in downtown Walpole.
Betro had been up for re-election to the Housing Authority this year, but failed to return his nomination papers on time. His seat, which was the only Housing Authority seat up for re-election this year, was then up for grabs to a write-in contender. The seat is for a five-year term.
The Housing Authority is one of the most autonomous parts of town government, in that its budget and operations are mostly under the control of the state, rather than the town. It operates a few affordable housing facilities in Walpole. One member of the Housing Authority is state-appointed.
Gov. Deval Patrick has recently proposed consolidating the state’s 240 housing authorities into 6 regional authorities to make them more efficient and more accountable. That proposal so far has not been acted upon by the legislature.
With Town Administrator Michael Boynton leaving, for a new job in Medway, politicos in Walpole are speculating who might be in the running to replace him. Among the internal candidates mentioned as potentially interested are Assistant Town Administrator Jim Johnson and outgoing Selectman Michael Berry. Meanwhile, there is a crop of outside candidates, namely Town Administrators and Assistant Town Administrators in other communities, that would likely seek to take over the Walpole job and bring a new outsider perspective.
What do you think? Should the Selectmen hire a new Town Administrator not from within the existing Town Hall power structure, or should we promote from within?
Winners indicated in italics
Precinct 1 (vote for seven):
Darren W. Hasenjaeger – 139
John T. Hasenjaeger – 142
Eric J. Hurwitz – 139
Marilyn A. Kelland – 146
David F. Lehto – 143
Jillian D. Morley – 142
John A. Leith – 146
Precinct 2 (vote for six):
James A Cappelletti – 238
Thomas F. Coyne, III – 249
Ellen H. Nadeau – 283
Jeffrey M Padell – 229
Jennifer J. Tashjian – 225
Valerie Khouri – 235
Thomas M. Mello – 245
Precinct 3 (vote for six):
Amy Anglin – 122
Patrick Hinton – 167
Betsy Mullen – 172
Michael Viano – 134
Philip Wild – 157
Ronald E. Mariani – 123
Susan Masterson – 126
Martha Ryan – 160
Mark Sullivan: 156
Precinct 4 (vote for five):
Mary Campbell – 178
William Carroll – 139
Elizabeth Gaffey – 149
Fiona Murphy – 153
Mary Murphy – 135
Mark Trudell – 107
David Eures – 117
Anita Waite – 132
Precinct 5 (vote for five):
Craig Dalton – 142
Kathleen Garvin – 154
John Murtagh – 181
Peter Drogan – 161
Kenneth Southwood – 141
Joseph Wyman – 139
Precinct 5 (one-year terms) (vote for two):
Jonathan Bourn – 169
Daniel McMackin – 195
Precinct 6 (vote for six):
Thomas Bowen – 145
Daniel Bruce – 169
Kenneth Guyette – 150
Marcie Handler – 143
Sally Rose – 165
Peter Scott – 161
Eric Skogseth – 145
Precinct 6 (two-year term) (vote for one):
Donna Donnellan – 198
Precinct 7 (vote for six):
Anthony Abril – 161
Robert Buckley – 171
Diane Culhane – 186
Phil Czacharowski – 165
Richard Nottebart – 188
Philip Dubois – 152
Laura Garrity – 160
Michele Markatos – 182
Richard Pilla – 200
Precinct 8 (vote for seven):
Richard P. Guisti – 201
James F. Kelliher – 181
Carol A. Lane – 186
David Melish -183
Joseph C. Moraski – 199
Brian J. Connor – 201
Christie A. Maciejewski – 204